The New Darwinian Naturalism in Political Theory
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 89 (2) , 389-400
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2082432
Abstract
There has been a resurgence of Darwinian naturalism in political theory, as manifested in the recent work of political scientists such as Roger Masters, Robert McShea, and James Q. Wilson. They belong to an intellectual tradition that includes not only Charles Darwin but also Aristotle and David Hume. Although most political scientists believe Darwinian social theory has been refuted, their objections rest on three false dichotomies: facts versus values, nature versus freedom, and nature versus nurture. Rejecting these dichotomies would allow the social sciences to be linked to the natural sciences through Darwinian biology.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Return of Phineas Gage: Clues About the Brain from the Skull of a Famous PatientScience, 1994
- The Darwinian Biology of Aristotle's Political AnimalsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1994
- Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared ApartScience, 1990
- Aristotle, chimpanzees and other political animalsSocial Science Information, 1990
- Reviving the superorganismJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1989
- The Selfish GeneAnthropological Quarterly, 1979
- Human Nature Theory and Political PhilosophyAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1978
- The Evolution of Reciprocal AltruismThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1971
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964
- The Conflict Between Evolutionary Theory and Christian BeliefNature, 1960