Regression dilution methods for meta-analysis: assessing long-term variability in plasma fibrinogen among 27 247 adults in 15 prospective studies
Open Access
- 1 December 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 35 (6) , 1570-1578
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl233
Abstract
Background Within-person variability in measured values of a risk factor can bias its association with disease. The extent of this regression dilution bias for plasma fibrinogen was investigated using repeat measurement data collected at varying time intervals on 27 247 adults in 15 prospective studies. Methods Regression dilution ratios (RDRs) were estimated from a linear regression of repeat measurements on baseline values in each study and for each time interval, and pooled allowing for within- and between-study heterogeneity. RDRs were estimated both without and with adjustment for confounders, and factors were investigated that might influence the RDRs. Results The unadjusted overall RDR was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.55), which decreased to 0.46 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.49) after adjustment for age, sex and measured values of other established vascular risk factors. The RDR did not vary materially by assay method, age, sex or smoking status, but decreased at higher levels of baseline fibrinogen. Conclusion It is appropriate to use an RDR of 0.5 to correct approximately for regression dilution bias in plasma fibrinogen values; however, this correction factor may produce somewhat conservative hazard ratios in adjusted analyses, at higher fibrinogen concentrations and in follow-up beyond a decade. More generally, the methods described in this report have widespread applicability to quantifying regression dilution bias in repeatability data from multiple prospective studies.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Issues in Life Course EpidemiologyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- The effect of measurement error in risk factors that change over time in cohort studies: do simple methods overcorrect for ‘regression dilution’?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- Collaborative meta-analysis of prospective studies of plasma fibrinogen and cardiovascular diseaseEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2004
- Regression Dilution Bias in Blood Total and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Blood Pressure in the Glostrup and Framingham Prospective StudiesEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2003
- Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigatedBMJ, 1994
- Measurement error, instrumental variables and corrections for attenuation with applications to meta‐analysesStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Systematic underestimation of association between serum cholesterol concentration and ischaemic heart disease in observational studies: data from the BUPA studyBMJ, 1994
- How independent are “independent” effects? relative risk estimation when correlated exposures are measured impreciselyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution biasPublished by Elsevier ,1990
- Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for systematic within‐person measurement errorStatistics in Medicine, 1989