How Good is the Modern Questionnaire? General Principles for Evaluation
- 1 April 1974
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Personality Assessment
- Vol. 38 (2) , 115-129
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1974.10119948
Abstract
Questionnaires are formally vulnerable to faking; but suffer additionally and unnecessarily from lack of agreement regarding the unitary traits through which scales are to be validated. Eight basic requirements for construction of factor-true scales are set out and it is shown that one or more is missing for 80% of recently published studies. Recognition that differences of procedure have, additionally, led to primary and secondary structures, respectively, would also reduce the apparent chaos of trait scale concepts.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- SEVEN MISSING NORMAL PERSONALITY FACTORS IN THE QUESTIONNAIRE PRIMARIESMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1973
- An Improved Definition, from 10 Researchers, of Second Order Personality Factors in Q Data (with Cross-Cultural Checks)The Journal of Social Psychology, 1972
- Factor Matching Procedures: an Improvement of the s Index; with TablesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1969
- CATTELL AND EYSENCK FACTOR SCORES RELATED TO COMREY PERSONALITY FACTORSMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1968
- Integration Of Two Personality Factor SystemsMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1968
- Trait-view theory of perturbations in ratings and self ratings (L(BR)- and Q-data): Its application to obtaining pure trait score estimates in questionnaires.Psychological Review, 1968
- Isolating Change And Invariance In Patterns Of BehaviorMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1966
- The Importance of Factor-Trueness and Validity, Versus Homogeneity and Orthogonality, in Test Scales1Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1964
- The indirect assessment of social attitudes.Psychological Bulletin, 1950
- Personality: A systematic theoretical and factual study, 1st ed.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1950