Is the galactic disk older than the halo?

Preprint
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Aim of this study is to infer the age of the Galactic Disk by means of the ages of old open clusters, and comment on some recent claims that the Galactic Disk can be older than the Halo. To this purpose, we analyze the Color-Magnitude Diagrams (CMDs) of six very old clusters, namely NGC 188, NGC 6791, Collinder 261, Melotte 66, Berkeley 39 and Berkeley 17, and determine their ages. For each cluster we use the most recent photometric and spectroscopic data and metallicity estimates. The ages are derived from the isochrone fitting method using the stellar models of the Padua library (Bertelli et al . 1994, Girardi et al. 1999). We find that the ages of these clusters fall in the range 4 to 9-10 Gyr: Melotte 66 is the youngest whereas NGC 6791 and Berkeley 17 have ages of about 9-10 Gyr. Previous estimates for Berkeley 17 indicated an age as old as 12 Gyr, almost falling within the range of classical globular clusters. In our analysis, this cluster is always very old but perhaps somewhat younger than in previous studies. However we call attention on the fact that the above ages are to be taken as provisional estimates, because of the many uncertaintes still affecting stellar models in the mass range 1.0 to 1.5 Mo. Despite this drawback of extant theory of stellar structure, if NGC 6791 and Berkeley 17 set the limit to the age of the Galactic Disk, this component of the Milky Way can be as old as 9-10 Gyr, but surely younger than the Galactic Halo, at least as inferred from recent determinations of the age of globular clusters. Finally, it is worth recalling that open clusters can only provide a lower limit to the age of the Galactic Disk, while other indicators - like White Dwarfs - are perhaps more suited to this task.
All Related Versions

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: