Functional organization of lateral cell groups of cat superior olivary complex

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
1. Single-unit discharges to auditory stimuli were recorded extracellularly from superior olivary complex (SOC) units located lateral to the medial superior olive. Stimuli consisted of monaurally or binaurally presented tone bursts. The response measures obtained were effective ear, nature of effect, stimulus-frequency representation, maximum output, latency of response, and temporal pattern of tone burst-elicited discharges. Electrolytic marks were made at the unit studied or at the end of the electrode tract and in the medial superior olive. Following each experiment the locations of the units studied were determined histologically. An atlas of the laterally located SOC cell groups was developed to permit classification of units on the basis of localization within cell groups. Units were also classified according to the effects of stimulating the two ears. 2. All SOC units located lateral to the medial superior olive were excited by stimulation of the ipsilateral ear. Stimulation of the contralateral ear either excited, inhibited, had no effect, or had a potentiating effect on the discharges elicited by stimulating the ipsilateral ear. 3. Most lateral superior olivary (LSO) units were inhibited by contralateral stimulation, were narrowly tuned, produced low to high levels of maximum output, had short latencies, and produced regular discharge patterns characterized by chopper PST histograms with narrow initial peaks. 4. Most units within the caudal margins of the LSO (pLSO) were not affected or were inhibited by a contralateral stimulus; many were broadly tuned and exhibited intensity functions with large dynamic range and low slope. These units also had long latencies and produced chopper PST histograms with wide initial peaks. 5. Most units located dorsal to the LSO (DPO and DLPO) were not affected by the contralateral stimulus, were narrowly tuned, produced moderate levels of maximum discharge, had long latencies, and produced chopper PST histograms with wide initial peaks. 6. Units located ventral to the LSO appeared to have response characteristics related to unit location. Most units below the ventral hilum of the LSO (VLPO) were inhibited by the contralateral stimulus and many were broadly tuned VLPO units produced wide or poorly defined narrow-chopper discharge patterns and intensity functions with high maximum output. Most units located ventral to the lateral loop of the LSO (LNTB) were not affected by the contralateral stimulus and had response characteristics that may be related to the rostrocaudal location of the unit. 7. The cell groups located dorsal and ventral to the LSO were tonotopically organized with low-frequency-sensitive units located laterally and high-frequency-sensitive units located medially. The units located along the caudal margins of the LSO had a tonotopic organization similar to that of the LSO.

This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit: