Comparative Study of Static, Dynamic, and Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Stretching Techniques on Flexibility
- 1 April 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 58 (2) , 615-618
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1984.58.2.615
Abstract
63 college women served as subjects in this 7-wk. study examining the effects of static, dynamic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitating stretching techniques on the flexibility of the hamstring-gastrocnemius muscles. Subjects were assigned to one of the 3 treatment groups and received treatment 3 days a week. A pretest, a midtest (after 11 treatment days), and a posttest (after 21 treatment days) were administered. Analysis of group and test effects was accomplished by using a 3 × 3 factorial design with the group factor nested and the test factor crossed. Post hoc analysis indicated that all scores significantly improved from pretest to posttest. The findings indicated all 3 methods of flexibility training produced significant improvements when pretest and posttest mean scores were compared.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- FLEXIBILITY TRAINING - BALLISTIC, STATIC OR PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION1982
- Six Mobilization Exercises for Active Range of Hip FlexionResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1980
- FlexibilityJournal of Physical Education and Recreation, 1980
- Comparison of the Hold-relax Procedure and Passive Mobilization on Increasing Muscle LengthPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1972
- Comparative Study of Three Stretching TechniquesPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1970
- Passive and Active Stretching of Muscles: Spring Stretch and Control GroupPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 1949