The modular treatment of agrammatism
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
- Vol. 5 (1-2) , 93-127
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09602019508520177
Abstract
Cognitive, or more specifically, psycholinguistic models of sentence processing disorders in agrammatism attempt to specify what types of mental computations (we call them linguistic skills) are affected, at what level of the model, and by what mechanism (e.g. retrieval failure, knowledge loss, capacity limitation). We outline a new, “modular treatments” approach to the rehabilitation of aphasia, using agrammatism as an example. This approach draws from the model-driven analysis an empirically and theoretically defensible enumeration of linguistic skills which are vulnerable to disruption in agrammatism. Specific interventions target each of the vulnerable skills, using designs that aim towards maximal generality in the affected population and that can be standardised for use in the clinic. Such targeted interventions are the “modules” of a complete rehabilitation programme. The clinician chooses which to administer and on what schedule, on a case-by-case basis.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cross-linguistic research in aphasia: An overviewBrain and Language, 1991
- Framing sentencesCognition, 1990
- Some aspects of sentence production in aphasiaAphasiology, 1989
- Sentence processing deficits: Theory and therapyCognitive Neuropsychology, 1988
- The role of intonation cues in aphasic patients' performance of the grammaticality judgment taskBrain and Language, 1988
- On the preservation of word order in aphasia: Cross-linguistic evidenceBrain and Language, 1988
- Comprehension in aphasia: A cross-linguistic study*1Brain and Language, 1987
- An effect of the accessibility of word forms on sentence structuresJournal of Memory and Language, 1987
- Syntactic persistence in language productionCognitive Psychology, 1986
- On considerations of method and theory governing the use of clinical categories in neurolinguistics and cognitive neuropsychology: The case against agrammatismCognition, 1985