Removal of the G2 Filter: Differences between Implantation Times Greater and Less than 180 Days
- 30 September 2009
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
- Vol. 20 (9) , 1200-1209
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2009.05.039
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Retrievable versus Permanent Caval Filter Procedures: When Are They Cost-effective for Interventional Radiology?Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2008
- Retrievability of the Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filter after Dwell Times Longer Than 180 days in Patients With Multiple TraumaJournal of Endovascular Therapy, 2007
- Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Retrievable Vena Cava Filters in Trauma Patients: An AAST Multicenter StudyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2007
- Wall-embedded Recovery Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Imaging Features and Technique for RemovalJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2006
- Retrievability of the Recovery Vena Cava Filter after Dwell Times Longer than 180 DaysJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2006
- The role of vena caval filters in the management of venous thromboembolismBlood Reviews, 2005
- The use of an interactive computerized daily schedule in a busy interventional radiology practice increases efficiencyJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2004
- Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy With Sodium BicarbonateJAMA, 2004
- Contrast Media-induced Nephrotoxicity: Identification of Patients at Risk and Algorithms for PreventionJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2001
- A Clinical Trial of Vena Caval Filters in the Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Proximal Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998