Publication Rates of Abstracts Presented at Annual Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Meetings
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 415 (415) , 98-103
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000093902.12372.76
Abstract
Beware of the unpublished abstract! What is the publication rate of abstracts presented at Musculoskeletal Tumor Society meetings, and how does this compare with other orthopaedic and medical meetings? Three hundred thirty-six podium presentations from six annual meetings were identified and their publication was searched at a minimum of 3 years after the event. An effort was made to determine what percent of these abstracts eventually were published in a peer-reviewed journal. It was determined that 137 abstracts were published for a publication rate of 41%. The average time between presentation at the meeting and publication was 21.8 plus or minus 13.5 months. The published articles appeared in 48 peer-reviewed journals. The rate of publication and time until publication was similar to other orthopaedic meetings and to other medical disciplines. Changes to the cohort, title, or authors occurred in approximately (1/3) of the published articles compared with the abstracts. These results suggest that for various reasons the majority of presented material at Musculoskeletal Tumor Society meetings may not survive peer review and may not be scientifically valid.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Observational Study of Orthopaedic Abstracts and Subsequent Full-Text PublicationsJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2002
- Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the orthopaedic research societyJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1998
- Publication Patterns of Papers Presented at the Annual Meeting of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons*Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1997
- Publication pattern of papers presented at the American Society for Surgery of the Hand Annual MeetingThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1996
- The fate of abstracts submitted to a cancer meeting: Factors which influence presentation and subsequent publicationAnnals of Oncology, 1992
- Factors Influencing Publication of Research ResultsJAMA, 1992
- Pattern of Publication of Ophthalmic Abstracts in Peer-reviewed JournalsOphthalmology, 1991
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991
- Fate of Cardiology Research Originally Published in Abstract Form | NEJMNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Surgical research: Master or servantThe American Journal of Surgery, 1978