Co-Treatment of PTH With Osteoprotegerin or Alendronate Increases Its Anabolic Effect on the Skeleton of Oophorectomized Mice
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 22 (1) , 55-63
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.060915
Abstract
We examined the effects of 60 days of co-treatment of PTH with either OPG or alendronate in oophorectomized mice. Compared with PTH alone, co-treatment of PTH with either of these two mechanistically distinct anti-catabolics improved bone volume, mechanical strength, and appendicular and axial mineralization and prolonged the beneficial effect of PTH on BMD. Conflicting evidence exists as to whether the anabolic effect of PTH is inhibited by the action of anti-catabolics. To examine this issue, we assessed the effects of alendronate and osteoprotegerin (OPG), two anti-catabolics with different modes of action, on the anabolic activity of PTH(1-34) in the skeleton of 4-month-old oophorectomized mice. Mice treated with vehicle alone (PBS), alendronate alone (100 microg/kg/week), OPG alone (10 mg/kg twice a week), or PTH alone (80 microg/kg/day) were compared with each other and with animals administered PTH plus alendronate or PTH plus OPG. We assessed lumbar spine and femoral BMD at 0, 30, and 60 days. Contact radiography, histology, and histomorphometry, three-point bending assay of the femur, and serum osteocalcin and TRACP5b assays were performed at 2 months. Although alendronate and OPG each suppressed bone turnover, at the doses used, this was more profound with OPG. Increases in lumbar spine and femoral BMD and in trabecular bone volume were at least as great with OPG as with alendronate, and mechanical indices of femoral bone strength improved only with OPG. Both produced a plateau in spine and femoral BMD increases by 30 days. Co-treatment of PTH with each anti-catabolic produced additive increases in BMD in the femur and supra-additive increases in the lumbar spine with no plateau effects. Neither anti-catabolic impeded the PTH-induced increase in bone volume or the increase in mechanical strength of the femur. These studies show that the highly potent anti-catabolic OPG can produce dramatic increases in BMD and bone strength; that the temporal pattern of activity of bone formation and resorption modulators may have major influence on net skeletal accrual; and that, depending on timing, inhibition of osteoclastic activity may markedly augment the anabolic action of PTH.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Denosumab in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mineral DensityNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Nitrogen-Containing Biphosphonates Inhibit the Mevalonate Pathway and Prevent Post-Translational Prenylation of GTP-Binding Proteins, Including RasJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2005
- Combined treatment with PTH (1–34) and OPG increases bone volume and uniformity of mineralization in aged ovariectomized ratsBone, 2005
- The Effects of Parathyroid Hormone, Alendronate, or Both in Men with OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- The Effects of Parathyroid Hormone and Alendronate Alone or in Combination in Postmenopausal OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- New Bone Formation with Teriparatide [Human Parathyroid Hormone-(1–34)] Is Not Retarded by Long-Term Pretreatment with Alendronate, Estrogen, or Raloxifene in Ovariectomized RatsEndocrinology, 2003
- OPG and PTH-(1–34) Have Additive Effects on Bone Density and Mechanical Strength in Osteopenic Ovariectomized RatsEndocrinology, 2001
- Alendronate Does Not Block the Anabolic Effect of PTH in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic WomenJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1998
- Osteoprotegerin Ligand Is a Cytokine that Regulates Osteoclast Differentiation and ActivationCell, 1998
- The anabolic effect of human PTH (1–34) on bone formation is blunted when bone resorption is inhibited by the bisphosphonate tiludronate—is activated resorption a prerequisite for the in vivo effect of PTH on formation in a remodeling system?Bone, 1995