Placement of Endosteal Implants in the Zygoma after Maxillectomy: A Cadaver Study Using Surgical Navigation
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 107 (3) , 659-667
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200103000-00003
Abstract
Endosteal implants facilitate obturator prosthesis fixation in tumor patients after maxillectomy. Previous clinical studies have shown, however, that the survival of implants placed into available bone after maxillectomy is generally poor. Nevertheless, implants positioned optimally in residual zygomatic bone provide superior stability from a biomechanical point of view. In a pilot study, the authors assessed the precision of VISIT, a computer-aided surgical navigation system dedicated to the placement of endosteal implants in the maxillofacial area. Five cadaver specimens underwent hemimaxillectomy. The cadaver head was matched to a preoperative high-resolution computed tomograph by using implanted surgical microscrews as fiducial markers. The position of a surgical drill relative to the cadaver head was determined with an optical tracking system. Implants were placed into the zygomatic arch, where maximum bone volume was available. The results were assessed using tests for localization accuracy and postoperative computed tomographic scans of the cadaver specimens. The localization accuracy of landmarks on the bony skull was 0.6 +/- 0.3 mm (average +/- SD), as determined with a 5-df pointer probe; the localization accuracy of the tip of the implant burr was 1.7 +/- 0.4 mm. The accuracy of the implant position compared with the planned position was 1.3 +/- 0.8 mm for the external perforation of the zygoma and 1.7 +/-1.3 mm for the internal perforation. Eight of 10 implants were inserted with maximal contact to surrounding bone, and two implants were located unfavorably. Reliable placement of implants in this region is difficult to achieve. The technique described in this article may be very helpful in the management of patients after maxillary resection with poor support for obturator prostheses.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical evaluation of implants retaining edentulous maxillary obturator prosthesesThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1997
- Bilateral Maxillectomy and Midfacial ReconstructionAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1995
- Restoration of oral function after maxillectomy with osseous integrated implant retained maxillary obturatorsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Maxillary obturator supported by osseointegrated implants placed in irradiated bone: Report of casesJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1993
- Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and future success in the Brånemark® systemClinical Oral Implants Research, 1992
- Increased retention of a maxillary obturator prosthesis using osteointegrated intramobile cylinder dental implants: A clinical reportThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1988
- Restoration of Masticatory Function by Microsurgically Revascularized Iliac Crest Bone Grafts Using Enosseous ImplantsPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1988
- The Osteocutaneous Scapular Flap for Mandibular and Maxillary ReconstructionPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1986
- Osseointegration in maxillofacial prosthetics. Part I: Intraoral applicationsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1986
- Late reconstruction of large maxillary defects after tumor-resectionJournal of Maxillofacial Surgery, 1973