Validation of a home safety questionnaire used in a randomised controlled trial
Open Access
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Injury Prevention
- Vol. 9 (2) , 180-183
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.9.2.180
Abstract
Objective:To measure the validity of self reported safety practices from a questionnaire, completed by families participating in a home safety randomised controlled trial.Methods:The postal questionnaire was used to measure secondary outcomes in a randomised controlled trial. The answers to 26 questions that could be assessed by observation were checked by a home visit. Families were invited to take part in a “home safety check”; they were not told that the visit was part of a validation study. At the time of the visit the researcher was blind to the self reports in the questionnaires.Results:Sixty four questionnaires were validated by visits to 64 households. Percentage agreement ranged from 58% to 100%. Sensitivity was high (68% or above) for most safety practices. The positive predictive value was also high for most safety practices (78% or above for 15 of the 16 practices).Conclusions:This study found a fairly high degree of consistency between self reported data and actual observations. The findings from this relatively small study need confirmation from larger studies.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do safety practices differ between responders and non-responders to a safety questionnaire?Injury Prevention, 2001
- Measuring Community Bicycle Helmet Use among ChildrenPublic Health Reports®, 2001
- The validity of self-reported seatbelt use: Hispanic and non-Hispanic drivers in El PasoAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2000
- Estimating the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms: a comparison of telephone survey and household survey results.American Journal of Public Health, 1999
- Evaluation of three smoke detector promotion programsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1998
- A randomised controlled trial of general practitioner safety advice for families with children under 5 yearsBMJ, 1998
- Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methodsStatistics in Medicine, 1998
- The study population: general characteristics and potential confounding factors.1997
- Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health surveyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1997
- Characteristics of respondents and non-respondents to a mailed questionnaire.American Journal of Public Health, 1980