Self reported receipt of care consistent with 32 quality indicators: national population survey of adults aged 50 or more in England
Open Access
- 13 August 2008
- Vol. 337 (aug13 2) , a957
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a957
Abstract
Objective To assess the receipt of effective healthcare interventions in England by adults aged 50 or more with serious health conditions. Design National structured survey questionnaire with face to face interviews covering medical panel endorsed quality of care indicators for both publicly and privately provided care. Setting Private households across England. Participants 8688 participants in the English longitudinal study of ageing, of whom 4417 reported diagnoses of one or more of 13 conditions. Main outcome measures Percentage of indicated interventions received by eligible participants for 32 clinical indicators and seven questions on patient centred care, and aggregate scores. Results Participants were eligible for 19 082 items of indicated care. Receipt of indicated care varied substantially by condition. The percentage of indicated care received by eligible participants was highest for ischaemic heart disease (83%, 95% confidence interval 80% to 86%), followed by hearing problems (79%, 77% to 81%), pain management (78%, 73% to 83%), diabetes (74%, 72% to 76%), smoking cessation (74%, 71% to 76%), hypertension (72%, 69% to 76%), stroke (65%, 54% to 76%), depression (64%, 57% to 70%), patient centred care (58%, 57% to 60%), poor vision (58%, 54% to 63%), osteoporosis (53%, 49% to 57%), urinary incontinence (51%, 47% to 54%), falls management (44%, 37% to 51%), osteoarthritis (29%, 26% to 32%), and overall (62%, 62% to 63%). Substantially more indicated care was received for general medical (74%, 73% to 76%) than for geriatric conditions (57%, 55% to 58%), and for conditions included in the general practice pay for performance contract (75%, 73% to 76%) than excluded from it (58%, 56% to 59%). Conclusions Shortfalls in receipt of basic recommended care by adults aged 50 or more with common health conditions in England were most noticeable in areas associated with disability and frailty, but few areas were exempt. Efforts to improve care have substantial scope to achieve better health outcomes and particularly need to include chronic conditions that affect quality of life of older people.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of process measures to monitor the quality of clinical practiceBMJ, 2007
- Combining Multiple Indicators of Clinical QualityMedical Care, 2007
- Geriatric Syndromes: Clinical, Research, and Policy Implications of a Core Geriatric ConceptJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2007
- The Effect of a Quality Improvement Initiative on the Quality of Other Aspects of Health CareMedical Care, 2007
- Potential population impact of the UK government strategy for reducing the burden of coronary heart disease in England: comparing primary and secondary prevention strategiesQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2006
- Pay-for-Performance Programs in Family Practices in the United KingdomNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- What is the Concordance Between the Medical Record and Patient Self-Report as Data Sources for Ambulatory Care?Medical Care, 2006
- Developing quality indicators for older adults: transfer from the USA to the UK is feasibleQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2004
- Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders: ACOVE Project OverviewAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical TechnologiesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1986