Higher Duplicability of Less Important Genes in Yeast Genomes
Open Access
- 8 September 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Vol. 23 (1) , 144-151
- https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj015
Abstract
Gene duplication plays an important role in evolution because it is the primary source of new genes. Many recent studies showed that gene duplicability varies considerably among genes. Several considerations led us to hypothesize that less important genes have higher rates of successful duplications, where gene importance is measured by the fitness reduction caused by the deletion of the gene. Here, we test this hypothesis by comparing the importance of two groups of singleton genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sce). Group S genes did not duplicate in four other yeast species examined, whereas group D experienced duplication in these species. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found group D genes to be less important than group S genes. Specifically, 17% of group D genes are essential in Sce, compared to 28% for group S. Furthermore, deleting a group D gene in Sce reduces the fitness by 24% on average, compared to 38% for group S. Our subsequent analysis showed that less important genes have more cis-regulatory motifs, which could lead to a higher chance of subfunctionalization of duplicate genes and result in an enhanced rate of gene retention. Less important genes may also have weaker dosage imbalance effects and cause fewer genetic perturbations when duplicated. Regardless of the cause, our observation indicates that the previous finding of a less severe fitness consequence of deleting a duplicate gene than deleting a singleton gene is at least in part due to the fact that duplicate genes are intrinsically less important than singleton genes and suggests that the contribution of duplicate genes to genetic robustness has been overestimated.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of mutational robustnessBioEssays, 2005
- Preferential Duplication of Conserved Proteins in Eukaryotic GenomesPLoS Biology, 2004
- Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiaeNature, 2004
- Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeastNature, 2003
- Evolution by gene duplication: an updateTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003
- Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elementsNature, 2003
- Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAiNature, 2003
- Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomeNature, 2002
- Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genomeNature, 2001
- CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choiceNucleic Acids Research, 1994