Relationship Between Changes in Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover and BMD to Predict Vertebral Fracture Risk
- 1 March 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 19 (3) , 394-401
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.0301243
Abstract
The change in BMD is a poor predictor of vertebral fracture risk after raloxifene treatment. One-year percent change in bone turnover and BMD was used to predict vertebral fracture risk. The percent change in osteocalcin was determined to be a better predictor of vertebral fracture risk than BMD.The association between baseline BMD and fracture risk is well understood. However, the relationship between changes in BMD and fracture risk is not well defined. It has previously been demonstrated that BMD change was a poor predictor of vertebral fracture risk in raloxifene-treated women, whereas bone turnover markers were significantly associated with fracture risk. In the current analysis, we explore the prediction of vertebral fracture risk using changes in both BMD and bone turnover.The Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 7705 women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene 60 or 120 mg/day for 3 years. Markers of bone turnover were measured in one-third of the study population (n = 2503), and the present analyses include these women. Logistic regression models were constructed using one-year percent changes in BMD and bone turnover and relevant baseline demographics to predict the risk of vertebral fracture with pooled raloxifene therapy at 3 years. All covariates were standardized before modeling to facilitate direct comparisons between changes in BMD and bone turnover.Prevalent vertebral fracture status (p < 0.0001), baseline lumbar spine BMD (p < 0.0001), and number of years postmenopausal (p = 0.0005) were independent predictors of fracture risk in raloxifene-treated patients. Therapy-by-change in femoral neck BMD (p = 0.02) and therapy-by-change in osteocalcin (OC; p = 0.01) were also significant for all treatment groups, indicating that changes in BMD and OC have different effects on fracture risk for the placebo and pooled raloxifene groups. The final model included significant baseline variables and change in OC (p = 0.01), whereas change in femoral neck BMD was not significant. After adjustment of each significant baseline variable, the percent change in OC was better able to predict the reduction in vertebral fracture risk than the percent change in femoral neck BMD in patients treated with raloxifene.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- A method to assess the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate endpointStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Variability and Response of Urinary Resorption Markers to Hormone Replacement TherapyJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1999
- Response of Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover to Hormone Replacement Therapy: Impact of Biological VariabilityJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1998
- Comparative calibration without a gold standardStatistics in Medicine, 1997
- Relationship of Bone Turnover to Bone Density and FracturesJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997
- Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: State of the artJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1996
- Dual X-ray absorptiometry quality control: Comparison of visual examination and process-control chartsJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1996
- Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseasesStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- The Jackknife Estimate of VarianceThe Annals of Statistics, 1981