Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine in geriatric outpatients with major depression: a double‐blind, randomised 6‐month comparative trial with citalopram

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background The objectives of the study were to compare efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine ER 75–150 mg/day with that of citalopram 10–20 mg/day in elderly patients with major depression according to DSM‐IV criteria. Methods A randomised, double‐blind, parallel group 6‐month study. Efficacy was assessed by MADRS, CGI Global Improvement, CGI Severity of Illness and GDS‐20 scores and safety by physical examinations, vital signs, adverse events and UKU side effect rating. Plasma levels of venlafaxine, its major metabolite O‐desmethylvenlafaxine and citalopram were followed. Results One hundred and fifty‐one male and female patients (64–89 years) were enrolled and 118 patients completed the study. Comparable improvements in MADRS, CGI Severity of Illness, CGI Global Improvement and GDS‐20 were observed during venlafaxine and citalopram treatment. The MADRS remission rate was 19% for venlafaxine and 23% for citalopram. Side effects were common during both treatments but differed in tremor being more common during citalopram and nausea/vomiting during venlafaxine treatment. There were no clinically significant changes in blood pressure or body weight. Conclusion The observed benefits of venlafaxine treatment in elderly patients with major depression were similar to those observed in younger adults as were reported adverse events and side effects. Treatment with venlafaxine ER was well tolerated and induced beneficial effects of similar magnitude as those of citalopram. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Funding Information
  • Wyeth Lederle Nordiska AB, Sweden