Second malignancies following adjuvant chemotherapy:6-year results from a Belgian randomized study comparing cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) with an anthracycline-based regimen in adjuvant treatment ofnode-positive breast cancer patients
Open Access
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 14 (5) , 693-698
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdg204
Abstract
Background: Alkylating agents and topoisomerase-II inhibitors have been associated with the occurrence of secondary leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes in breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Conversely, data on the occurrence of second solid malignancies in this setting are scarce. Patients and methods: This study retrospectively evaluates the occurrence of second hematological and solid malignancies in the context of a prospective multicenter phase III trial comparing epirubicin–cyclophosphamide at intermediate doses (EC), or at full doses (HEC), with classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in 777 patients with early breast cancer. Results: At a median follow-up of 73 months, the following 8-year actuarial rates of second solid primaries were observed: CMF 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5% to 9.5%], EC 4.1% (95% CI 0.1% to 8.1%), and HEC 7.2% (95% CI 3.2% to 11.2%) (P = 0.79 by log rank test). Three secondary acute myeloid leukemias (AML) were reported, all in the HEC arm (incidence = 1.2%, 95% CI 0.0% to 2.5%), which by a three arm comparison allows us to conclude that HEC is statistically different (borderline significance) from CMF and EC (P = 0.05). Conclusions: HEC, as delivered in this trial, cannot be recommended in clinical practice because of the lack of superiority over classic CMF and because of the increased risk of AML observed in this arm. Prolongation of conventional anthracycline-based treatment beyond the current standard of four to six cycles is not recommended in clinical practice.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phase III Trial Comparing Two Dose Levels of Epirubicin Combined With Cyclophosphamide With Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil in Node-Positive Breast CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Benefit of a High-Dose Epirubicin Regimen in Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients With Poor Prognostic Factors: 5-Year Follow-Up Results of French Adjuvant Study Group 05 Randomized TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Intensification of Adjuvant Chemotherapy: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide With High-Dose Mitoxantrone and Cyclophosphamide With Filgrastim in Operable Breast Cancer With 10 or More Involved Axillary NodesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Increased Risk of Acute Leukemia After Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Population-Based StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Secondary myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukaemia following mitoxantrone-based therapy for breast carcinomaBritish Journal of Cancer, 2000
- Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trialsThe Lancet, 1998
- Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Risk of Leukemia after Chemotherapy and Radiation Treatment for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Proposals for the Classification of the Acute Leukaemias French‐American‐British (FAB) Co‐operative GroupBritish Journal of Haematology, 1976
- Combination Chemotherapy as an Adjuvant Treatment in Operable Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1976