Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale
- 25 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Internal Medicine Journal
- Vol. 35 (12) , 706-710
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2005.00948.x
Abstract
Aim: To review the safety and efficacy of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in symptomatic patients without the use of general anaesthesia or echocardiographic guidance.Method: All patients accepted for percutaneous PFO closure by our service from August 2002 to August 2004 were included. Patient demographics and clinical information were obtained from clinical records and by telephone interview. Follow‐up outcomes recorded were recurrence of systemic thromboembolism, residual shunt, and change in pattern of migraines.Results: Forty consecutive adult patients, of whom 19 (48%) had an atrial septal aneurysm (ASA), underwent PFO closure using the Amplatzer occluder device with fluoroscopic guidance alone. Their mean age was 45 ± 10 years (range 23–63 years) and 24 (60%) were male. The indications for closure were ischaemic stroke (n = 26), transient ischaemic attack (TIA) (n = 8), both stroke and TIA (n = 2), refractory hypoxia (n = 2), platypnoea‐orthodeoxia (n = 1) and severe migraine with seizures (n = 1). Twenty patients suffered a single neurological event and 16 suffered >1 event, including six with only radiographic evidence of >1 event. Mean procedure time was 17.7 ± 9.6 min and fluoroscopy time was 6.7 ± 7.3 min. Implanted device sizes were 18 mm (n = 1), 25 mm (n = 37) and 35 mm (n = 2). In 33 patients, the procedure was performed as a day‐case. No complications were encountered. No further neurological events occurred in 39 patients at a mean follow‐up time of 11 ± 7 months (3–25 months) nor was a significant shunt detected in the 34 who underwent follow‐up echocardiography.Conclusions: Percutaneous closure of PFO with or without ASA, under local anaesthesia and without echocardiographic guidance, is a safe and effective procedure which can be performed as a day‐case. This has now become our standard clinical practice. (Intern Med J 2005; 35: 706–710)Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale Really “Shut the Door?”Stroke, 2004
- Clinical outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure for paradoxical emboli without echocardiographic guidanceCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2004
- Transcatheter Amplatzer Device Closure of Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Presumed Paradoxical EmbolismMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2004
- Recurrent Cerebrovascular Events Associated with Patent Foramen Ovale, Atrial Septal Aneurysm, or BothNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Patent foramen ovale and brain infarct. Echocardiographic predictors, recurrence, and prevention.Stroke, 1994
- Characteristics of patent foramen ovale associated with cryptogenic stroke. A biplane transesophageal echocardiographic study.Stroke, 1994
- Atrial septal aneurysm and patent foramen ovale as risk factors for cryptogenic stroke in patients less than 55 years of age. A study using transesophageal echocardiography.Stroke, 1993
- Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography and association with cerebral and peripheral embolic eventsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Prevalence of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients with StrokeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Incidence and Size of Patent Foramen Ovale During the First 10 Decades of Life: An Autopsy Study of 965 Normal HeartsPublished by Elsevier ,1984