Seeing and knowing: On the ascription of mental states to young children.

Abstract
In the language and thought of adults, a clear distinction is usually drawn between what one sees, what one infers or thinks on the basis of what one sees, and what one is certain of or knows to be the case. We shall present some evidence that young children do not make such distinctions, but rather conflate what they see with the interpretations they assign. We use this evidence to argue against the ascription of certain types of mental states to young children, animals and computers.