Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 29 (7) , 1370-1379
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200107000-00012
Abstract
Objective To develop and validate an instrument for use in the intensive care unit to accurately diagnose delirium in critically ill patients who are often nonverbal because of mechanical ventilation. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting The adult medical and coronary intensive care units of a tertiary care, university-based medical center. Patients Thirty-eight patients admitted to the intensive care units. Measurements and Main Results We designed and tested a modified version of the Confusion Assessment Method for use in intensive care unit patients and called it the CAM-ICU. Daily ratings from intensive care unit admission to hospital discharge by two study nurses and an intensivist who used the CAM-ICU were compared against the reference standard, a delirium expert who used delirium criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fourth edition). A total of 293 daily, paired evaluations were completed, with reference standard diagnoses of delirium in 42% and coma in 27% of all observations. To include only interactive patient evaluations and avoid repeat-observer bias for patients studied on multiple days, we used only the first-alert or lethargic comparison evaluation in each patient. Thirty-three of 38 patients (87%) developed delirium during their intensive care unit stay, mean duration of 4.2 ± 1.7 days. Excluding evaluations of comatose patients because of lack of characteristic delirium features, the two critical care study nurses and intensivist demonstrated high interrater reliability for their CAM-ICU ratings with kappa statistics of 0.84, 0.79, and 0.95, respectively (p < .001). The two nurses’ and intensivist’s sensitivities when using the CAM-ICU compared with the reference standard were 95%, 96%, and 100%, respectively, whereas their specificities were 93%, 93%, and 89%, respectively. Conclusions The CAM-ICU demonstrated excellent reliability and validity when used by nurses and physicians to identify delirium in intensive care unit patients. The CAM-ICU may be a useful instrument for both clinical and research purposes to monitor delirium in this challenging patient population.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selecting Target Conditions for Quality of Care Improvement in Vulnerable Older AdultsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2000
- Delirium: a symptom of how hospital care is failing older persons and a window to improve quality of hospital careThe American Journal of Medicine, 1999
- A Multicomponent Intervention to Prevent Delirium in Hospitalized Older PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Does delirium contribute to poor hospital outcomes?Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1998
- Intensive care syndrome: a literature reviewIntensive and Critical Care Nursing, 1996
- The dilemma of delirium: Clinical and research controversies regarding diagnosis and evaluation of delirium in hospitalized elderly medical patientsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A Simple Multiple System Organ Failure Scoring System Predicts Mortality of Patients Who Have Sepsis SyndromeChest, 1993
- Post‐Operative Delirium: Predictors and Prognosis in Elderly Orthopedic PatientsJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1992
- Psychiatric Morbidity during the Early Phase of Coronary Care for Myocardial Infarction: Association with Cardiac Diagnosis and Outcome*The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 1992
- DeliriumArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1992