Comparison of Macrobenthos Collected with Cores and Suction Sampler in Vegetated and Unvegetated Marine Habitats
- 1 March 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Estuaries
- Vol. 6 (1) , 76-82
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1351809
Abstract
A comparison of shallow water benthic macrofauna collected with hand-held cores and a suction sampler shoed that the core method provided the best estimate of macrofaunal density and composition. In a bare sand habitat, suction methods collected 72.8% fewer individuals per unit surface area of sediment. The difference was 32.6% in a seagrass (Halodule wrightii) habitat. At each site the number of species collected with the two devices was similar; however, population densities of numerically important species were underestimated with the suction device resulting in effects on community statistics. In addition to high sampling efficiency and statistical advantages associated with the use of the multiple cores, ease of operation and low construction cost make simple core tubes the preferred gear for sampling small macrobenthos in soft sediments, with or without vegetation.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative efficiency of the day and Smith-McIntyre grabsEstuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 1978
- The efficiency and effectiveness of a diver-operated suction sampler on a homogeneous macrofaunaEstuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 1976
- Relationships among Functional Properties of Californian GrasslandNature, 1967
- Comparative Efficiencies of Van Veen and Smith‐McIntyre Grab Samplers as Revealed by Motion PicturesEcology, 1967
- A REVIEW OF GRAIN‐SIZE PARAMETERSSedimentology, 1966