“Hello, hello—it’s English I speak!”: a qualitative exploration of patients’ understanding of the science of clinical trials
Open Access
- 3 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 31 (11) , 664-669
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.011064
Abstract
Informed consent may be seriously compromised if patients fail to understand the experimental nature of the trial in which they are participating. Using focus groups, the authors explored how prospective trial participants interpret and understand the science of clinical trials by using patient information sheets relative to their medical condition. An opportunity was provided to hear in the patients’ own words how they interpret the information and why there is variable understanding. Respondents struggled to comprehend the meaning and purpose of concepts such as randomisation and double blinding, and found them threatening to their ideas of medical care. Suggestions are made about how to improve the national guidelines on written information for trial participants and pretesting of the information sheets is advocated.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomisation in trials: do potential trial participants understand it and find it acceptable?Journal of Medical Ethics, 2004
- Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative studyJournal of Medical Ethics, 2004
- Can the written information to research subjects be improved?--an empirical study.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1999
- Attitudes to randomized clinical trials amongst out‐patients attending a medical oncology clinicHealth Expectations, 1999
- Public Understanding of Genetics and Alzheimer DiseaseGenetic Testing, 1999
- Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1996
- Public understanding of scienceThe Lancet, 1996
- Breast cancer trials: a patient's viewpointThe Lancet, 1992
- Randomised comparison of procedures for obtaining informed consent in clinical trials of treatment for cancer.BMJ, 1986
- How informed is informed consent?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1981