Clinical Features and Outcome of Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Harbor EML4-ALK
Top Cited Papers
- 10 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 27 (26) , 4247-4253
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.22.6993
Abstract
Purpose: The EML4-ALK fusion oncogene represents a novel molecular target in a small subset of non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC). To aid in identification and treatment of these patients, we examined the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients who had NSCLC with and without EML4-ALK. Patients and Methods: Patients with NSCLC were selected for genetic screening on the basis of two or more of the following characteristics: female sex, Asian ethnicity, never/light smoking history, and adenocarcinoma histology. EML4-ALK was identified by using fluorescent in situ hybridization for ALK rearrangements and was confirmed by immunohistochemistry for ALK expression. EGFR and KRAS mutations were determined by DNA sequencing. Results: Of 141 tumors screened, 19 (13%) were EML4-ALK mutant, 31 (22%) were EGFR mutant, and 91 (65%) were wild type (WT/WT) for both ALK and EGFR. Compared with the EGFR mutant and WT/WT cohorts, patients with EML4-ALK mutant tumors were significantly younger (P < .001 and P = .005) and were more likely to be men (P = .036 and P = .039). Patients with EML4-ALK–positive tumors, like patients who harbored EGFR mutations, also were more likely to be never/light smokers compared with patients in the WT/WT cohort (P < .001). Eighteen of the 19 EML4-ALK tumors were adenocarcinomas, predominantly the signet ring cell subtype. Among patients with metastatic disease, EML4-ALK positivity was associated with resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Patients in the EML4-ALK cohort and the WT/WT cohort showed similar response rates to platinum-based combination chemotherapy and no difference in overall survival. Conclusion: EML4-ALK defines a molecular subset of NSCLC with distinct clinical characteristics. Patients who harbor this mutation do not benefit from EGFR TKIs and should be directed to trials of ALK-targeted agents.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The EML4‐ALK fusion gene is involved in various histologic types of lung cancers from nonsmokers with wild‐type EGFR and KRASCancer, 2009
- Erlotinib in Lung Cancer — Molecular and Clinical Predictors of OutcomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- The 2004 World Health Organization classification of lung tumorsSeminars in Roentgenology, 2005
- Clinical and Biological Features Associated With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutations in Lung CancersJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- KRAS Mutations and Primary Resistance of Lung Adenocarcinomas to Gefitinib or ErlotinibPLoS Medicine, 2005
- EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib TherapyScience, 2004
- Activating Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Underlying Responsiveness of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer to GefitinibNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Global and regional estimates of cancer mortality and incidence by site: II. results for the global burden of disease 2000BMC Cancer, 2002
- Comparison of Four Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000