Does Reporting Heterogeneity Bias the Measurement of Health Disparities?
- 1 March 2006
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Heterogeneity in reporting of health by socio-economic and demographic characteristics potentially biases the measurement of health disparities. We use anchoring vignettes to identify reporting heterogeneity in self reports on health for Indonesia, India and China. Correcting for reporting heterogeneity tends to reduce estimated disparities in health by age, sex (not Indonesia), urban/rural and education (not China) and to increase income disparities in health. Overall, while homogeneous reporting by socio-demographic group is significantly rejected, the results suggest that the size of the reporting bias in measures of health disparities is not large.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cut-point shift and index shift in self-reported healthJournal of Health Economics, 2004
- Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey ResearchAmerican Political Science Review, 2004
- Comparability of self rated health: cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettesBMJ, 2004
- How large is the bias in self‐reported disability?Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2004
- Socioeconomic inequalities in health: Measurement, computation, and statistical inferenceJournal of Econometrics, 1997
- Gender variations in clinical pain experiencePain, 1996
- Subjective health measures and state dependent reporting errorsHealth Economics, 1995
- Self-Reported Versus Objective Measures of Health in Retirement ModelsThe Journal of Human Resources, 1991
- Measuring the Effect of Disability on Labor Force ParticipationThe Journal of Human Resources, 1989
- Death CertificationBMJ, 1893