Comparative accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler pressure half-time methods in assessing severity of mitral stenosis in patients with and without prior commissurotomy.
- 1 January 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 73 (1) , 100-107
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.73.1.100
Abstract
This study was undertaken to compare the accuracies of the two-dimensional echocardiographic (2DE) and Doppler pressure half-time methods for the noninvasive estimation of cardiac catheterization measurements of mitral valve area in patients with pure mitral stenosis both with and without a previous commissurotomy. Data were retrospectively obtained from 74 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac catheterization within a 30 month period for evaluation of mitral stenosis, and who had two-dimensional echocardiograms performed before catheterization. Six patients (8.1%) had technically inadequate 2DE images and their data were excluded from analysis. Two of these patients had undergone commissurotomy, while the remaining four had not. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic examinations were attempted in 45 patients and adequate measurements of pressure half-times were obtained in all patients studied. Mitral valve area by two-dimensional echocardiography was measured as the planimetered area along the inner border of the smallest mitral orifice visualized during short-axis scanning, while pressure half-time was calculated as the interval between the peak transmitral velocity and velocity/square root 2 as measured from the envelope of the Doppler spectral signal. Calculations from catheterization represented the minimal valve area at rest as derived from the Gorlin formula with the use of pressure gradients and thermodilution measurements of cardiac output. Thirty-seven of the patients had had a previous mitral commissurotomy a mean of 11.2 +/- 5.4 years before, while the remaining 37 patients were previously unoperated. Mean valve area as determined at catheterization for the total group of patients ranged from 0.37 to 2.30 cm2 (mean = 1.08 +/- 0.42 cm2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. IPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasoundJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983
- Progression of mild mitral stenosis and incidence of restenosis after open commissurotomy: A study using echocardiographyAmerican Heart Journal, 1979
- Determination of pre- and postoperative flow obstruction in patients undergoing closed mitral commissurotomy from non-invasive ultrasound Doppler data and cardiac outputAmerican Heart Journal, 1979
- Reliability and reproducibility of two dimensional echocardiographic measurement of the stenotic mitral valve orifice areaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1979
- Alteration of the left ventricular pressure-volume relationship in man and its effect on the mitral echocardiographic early diastolic closure slope.Circulation, 1977
- Mitral valve early diastolic closing velocity in the echocardiogram: Relation to sequential diastolic flow and ventricular complianceThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1976
- Diastolic closure rate of normal mitral valve.Heart, 1973
- Controversial aspects of rheumatic heart disease.BMJ, 1968
- The spectrum of pure mitral stenosisThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1962