Implicit memory is not immune to interference.
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 127 (5) , 618-628
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.5.618
Abstract
Does interference, a primary source of forgetting in explicit memory, also affect implicit memory? Several early and highly influential studies have suggested that implicit memory is immune to interference. In contrast, a number of subsequent investigations have reported evidence for interference. As well, amnesic patients, whose performance relies primarily on implicit memory, often show interference effects. A review of methods, materials, and findings suggests that interference occurs on implicit tests when targets and nontargets are similar and so compete as potential responses to the memory cue. Further, there is some evidence that the degree of interference on implicit tasks is affected by the number of competing items and their strength relative to the target. Interference effects in implicit memory seem to parallel those in explicit memory, and the authors consider the implications of this conclusion for theoretical concepts of memory and the brain.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Functional Neuroanatomy of Recall and Recognition: A PET Study of Episodic MemoryJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1997
- Dissociations in infant memory: Rethinking the development of implicit and explicit memory.Psychological Review, 1997
- Processing implicit and explicit representations.Psychological Review, 1992
- Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.Psychological Review, 1992
- A bias interpretation of facilitation in perceptual identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1989
- Amnesic sensitivity to proactive interference: Its relationship to priming and the causes of amnesiaNeuropsychologia, 1987
- Retrieval processes in perceptual recognition and cued recall: The influence of category sizeMemory & Cognition, 1984
- Critical issues in interference theoryMemory & Cognition, 1973
- LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONSJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1957
- Meaningful Relation and Retroactive InhibitionThe American Journal of Psychology, 1931