The binding of antihistone antibodies to crithidia luciliae kinetoplasts is growth cycle‐dependent
Open Access
- 1 February 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 28 (2) , 163-168
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780280210
Abstract
The Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence (CLIF) assay is widely used to test for native DNA (nDNA) antibodies in the diagnosis and management of systemic lupus erythematosus. However, sera from patients with drug‐induced lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis, which should not contain nDNA antibodies, occasionally react with the CL kinetoplast. We examined 36 sera from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome, and drug‐induced lupus erythematosus, who had positive CLIF tests. All 36 sera were also antinuclear antibody‐positive with homogeneous and/or peripheral staining patterns on mouse kidney substrates. After hydrochloric acid extraction of the CL smears to remove histone and other nuclear protein antiges, 14 of the 36 sera no longer produced a positive result on the CLIF test. Ten of these 14 sera again gave a positive CLIF result after the hydrochloric acid‐extracted Crithidia substrate had been reconstituted with purified histone. These studies demonstrated that kinetoplast binding was due to antihistone antibodies in at least 10 of 36 initially CLIF‐positive sera. Antihistone antibodies were then purified with a histone‐affinity column, and these purified antibodies were reactive with CL kinetoplasts. Thus, the CLIF test is not specific for nDNA antibodies. Additional studies using CL from different days of culture indicated that histone antigen expression in the CL kinetoplast was a function of the life cycle of this organism and is most readily detected 2 days after initiation of culture.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reappraisal of the Specificity of the Crithidia luciliae Assay for nDNA Antibodies: Evidence for Histone Antibody Kinetoplast BindingAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1984
- Double stranded DNA antibody quantification by the FARR assay and indirect immunolluorescence test using Crithidia lucilaeInternational Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology, 1982
- Double-stranded DNA antibodies: a comparison of four methods of detection.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1981
- Clinical Usefulness of theCrithida luciliaeTest for Antibodies to Native DNAAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1979
- An Appraisal of Tests for Native DNA Antibodies in Connective Tissue DiseasesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1978
- Antibodies to Double-stranded DNA: A Comparison of the Indirect Immunofluorescent Test Using Crithidia luciliae and the DNA-binding AssayAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1978
- An immunofluorescent method using crithidia luciliae to detect antibodies to double‐stranded DNAArthritis & Rheumatism, 1977
- An immunofluorescence procedure for the demonstration of antibodies to native, double-stranded DNA and of circulating DNA-anti-DNA complexesClinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 1976
- Effect of Enzyme Treatment of Chrithidia Luciliae on the Reactivity of Its Kinetoplast with Anti-Dna SeraScandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 1976
- IMMUNOLOGY OF DNA. III. CRITHIDIA LUCILIAE, A SIMPLE SUBSTRATE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ANTI‐dsDNA WITH THE IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE TECHNIQUE*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1975