Lasofoxifene in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis
Top Cited Papers
- 25 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 362 (8) , 686-696
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0808692
Abstract
The effects of lasofoxifene on the risk of fractures, breast cancer, and cardiovascular disease are uncertain. In this randomized trial, we assigned 8556 women who were between the ages of 59 and 80 years and had a bone mineral density T score of –2.5 or less at the femoral neck or spine to receive once-daily lasofoxifene (at a dose of either 0.25 mg or 0.5 mg) or placebo for 5 years. Primary end points were vertebral fractures, estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer, and nonvertebral fractures; secondary end points included major coronary heart disease events and stroke. Lasofoxifene at a dose of 0.5 mg per day, as compared with placebo, was associated with reduced risks of vertebral fracture (13.1 cases vs. 22.4 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.70), nonvertebral fracture (18.7 vs. 24.5 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91), ER-positive breast cancer (0.3 vs. 1.7 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.56), coronary heart disease events (5.1 vs. 7.5 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.93), and stroke (2.5 vs. 3.9 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.99). Lasofoxifene at a dose of 0.25 mg per day, as compared with placebo, was associated with reduced risks of vertebral fracture (16.0 vs. 22.4 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.83) and stroke (2.4 vs. 3.9 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.96) Both the lower and higher doses, as compared with placebo, were associated with an increase in venous thromboembolic events (3.8 and 2.9 cases vs. 1.4 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratios, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.55 to 4.58] and 2.06 [95% CI, 1.17 to 3.60], respectively). Endometrial cancer occurred in three women in the placebo group, two women in the lower-dose lasofoxifene group, and two women in the higher-dose lasofoxifene group. Rates of death per 1000 person-years were 5.1 in the placebo group, 7.0 in the lower-dose lasofoxifene group, and 5.7 in the higher-dose lasofoxifene group. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, lasofoxifene at a dose of 0.5 mg per day was associated with reduced risks of nonvertebral and vertebral fractures, ER-positive breast cancer, coronary heart disease, and stroke but an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00141323.)Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effects of Tibolone in Older Postmenopausal WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- High-Trauma Fractures and Low Bone Mineral Density in Older Women and MenJAMA, 2007
- Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators for Postmenopausal OsteoporosisDrugs & Aging, 2007
- Prevention of bone loss in postmenopausal women treated with lasofoxifene compared with raloxifeneMenopause, 2006
- BMD at Multiple Sites and Risk of Fracture of Multiple Types: Long-Term Results From the Study of Osteoporotic FracturesJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2003
- Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Plus Progestin in Healthy Postmenopausal Women: Principal Results From the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled TrialJAMA, 2002
- Reduction of Vertebral Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Treated With RaloxifeneResults From a 3-Year Randomized Clinical TrialJAMA, 1999
- Tamoxifen for Prevention of Breast Cancer: Report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 StudyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1998
- Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosisJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1996
- A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significanceBiometrika, 1988