Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Memory & Cognition
- Vol. 21 (5) , 689-698
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197199
Abstract
Digitized photographs of snowflakes were presented for a recognition test after retention intervals of varying durations. While overall accuracy and discrimination remained constant, as the retention interval increased, primacy increased from chance to reliably better than chance while recency decreased to chance levels. A variation of Murdock's (1960) distinctiveness model accounted for the changing primacy and recency effects observed in both between- and within-subjects designs. The generality of the model was examined in two different paradigms: lexical access during sentence processing, and free recall in the continual distractor paradigm. In both cases, the model made accurate qualitative predictions for both latency and accuracy measures.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Working MemoryScience, 1992
- Can we have a distinctive theory of memory?Memory & Cognition, 1991
- A distinctiveness model of serial learning.Psychological Review, 1991
- Schedules of presentation and temporal distinctiveness in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990
- Building and accessing clausal representations: The advantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recencyJournal of Memory and Language, 1989
- Bizarre imagery as an effective memory aid: The importance of distinctiveness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1986
- A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1986
- An analysis of the strength-latency relationshipMemory & Cognition, 1985
- Serial-position effects in infants’ recognition memoryMemory & Cognition, 1983
- Memory, Historically and Experimentally Considered. I. An Historical Sketch of the Older Conceptions of MemoryThe American Journal of Psychology, 1888