Monitoring by rheumatologists for methotrexate‐, etanercept‐, infliximab‐, and anakinra‐associated adverse events
Open Access
- 7 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 48 (10) , 2769-2772
- https://doi.org/10.1002/art.11277
Abstract
Objective: To determine what monitoring protocols rheumatologists use to identify adverse events in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with methotrexate (methotrexate), etanercept (etanercept), infliximab (infliximab), and anakinra (anakinra), how often rheumatologists encounter treatment‐altering adverse events in their RA patients receiving these treatments, and how they feel about and comply with the current monitoring guidelines.Methods: Three hundred ten physician members of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) were notified by e‐mail of a survey that was posted on our rheumatology Web site. Questions were closed‐ended and multiple choice in format.Results: One hundred twenty‐three responses were received (40%). Most rheumatologists reported that they utilize the ACR recommended screening tests at baseline before methotrexate treatment is initiated. Seventy‐nine percent reported that treatment‐altering abnormalities had occurred in <5% of their methotrexate‐treated RA patients, and 88% reported that such abnormalities had occurred in <10% of such patients, in the previous 3 years. Forty‐one percent believed liver function monitoring guidelines need to be changed; 59% said they would agree with new guidelines that would include a recommendation for liver function monitoring every 3–4 months. Most rheumatologists were not aware of any guidelines for monitoring by blood tests in RA patients treated with biologic agents, yet the majority reported that they order blood tests before patients start these therapies and on followup.Conclusion: Our survey indicates that treatment‐altering liver function abnormalities in methotrexate‐treated RA patients are rare, and more than half of rheumatologists agree that a less stringent monitoring regimen should be considered. Rheumatologists and pharmaceutical companies might work together to develop guidelines for monitoring of patients treated with biologic agents.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physician treatment preferences in rheumatoid arthritis of differing disease severity and activity: The impact of cost on first‐line therapyArthritis Care & Research, 2002
- Criteria for early rheumatoid arthritis: From Bayes' law revisited to new thoughts on pathogenesisArthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- Treating rheumatoid arthritis early: A window of opportunity?Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2002
- How is it best to treat early rheumatoid arthritis patients?Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 2001
- The changing face of rheumatoid arthritis therapy: Results of serial surveysArthritis & Rheumatism, 2000
- Evidence-based medicine or medicines-based evidence?Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1998
- Methotrexate hepatotoxicity: What is the evidence?Inflammation Research, 1998
- Creating a care‐effective cost‐effective strategy for methotrexate liver toxicity monitoring in rheumatoid arthritis: comment on the article by kremer et alArthritis & Rheumatism, 1995
- Suggested guidelines for monitoring liver toxicity in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with methotrexate: comment on the article by kremer et alArthritis & Rheumatism, 1994
- Methotrexate for Rheumatoid ArthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1994