European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic radiocarbon dates are often older than they look: problems with previous dates and some remedies
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Vol. 85 (327) , 235-249
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003598x00067570
Abstract
Few events of European prehistory are more important than the transition from ancient to modern humans around 40 000 years ago, a period that unfortunately lies near the limit of radiocarbon dating. This paper shows that as many as 70 per cent of the oldest radiocarbon dates in the literature may be too young, due to contamination by modern carbon. Future dates can be made more secure — and previous dates revised — using more refined methods of pre-treatment described here.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current Pretreatment Methods for AMS Radiocarbon Dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (Orau)Radiocarbon, 2010
- Towards radiocarbon calibration beyond 28ka using speleothems from the BahamasEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 2009
- Age of the final Middle Palaeolithic and Uluzzian levels at Fumane Cave, Northern Italy, using 14C, ESR, 234U/230Th and thermoluminescence methodsJournal of Archaeological Science, 2008
- Radiocarbon dating the late Middle Paleolithic and the Aurignacian of the Swabian JuraJournal of Human Evolution, 2008
- Neandertals and moderns mixed, and it mattersEvolutionary Anthropology, 2006
- Revised direct radiocarbon dating of the Vindija G 1 Upper Paleolithic NeandertalsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Extremely Large Variations of Atmospheric 14 C Concentration During the Last Glacial PeriodScience, 2001
- Neanderthal contraction and modern human colonization of EuropePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2000
- The Neanderthal Problem ContinuedCurrent Anthropology, 1999
- New Method of Collagen Extraction for Radiocarbon DatingNature, 1971