Making Evidence Available: Prognostic Classification Systems
Open Access
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Interventional Neuroradiology
- Vol. 3 (4) , 289-293
- https://doi.org/10.1177/159101999700300403
Abstract
Claims of treatment selectivity can represent an important therapeutic advance: however, most such claims cannot be confirmed with independent data. This implies a management dilemma when confronted with ambiguous information on the risks of therapies and, most of all, insufficient criteria for identifying patients at risk. An accurate assessment of prognosis can help overcome the uncertainties facing the patients. But the identification of prognostic factors is subject to certain caveats. An essential part of prognostic factor analysis is standardization, a fact that is often overlooked. Thus, two different studies identifying the prognostic value of a factor may not be truly comparable, making a meaningful comparison difficult. Therefore, the development of an accurate prognostic system provides a method of conveying clinical experience to others without ambiguity.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORSStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- Statistical aspects of prognostic factor studies in oncologyBritish Journal of Cancer, 1994
- A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformationsJournal of Neurosurgery, 1986
- Clinical judgment and statistics. Lessons from a simulated randomized trial in coronary artery disease.Circulation, 1980