The population dynamics of plants
- 29 November 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 330 (1257) , 125-140
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1990.0187
Abstract
Long-term studies of plant populations are reviewed, and their dynamics summarized in three categories. Many short-lived plants have ephemeral, pulsed dynamics lasting only a single generation, with recruitment determined almost entirely by germination biology and by the frequency and intensity of disturbance. Such populations are not amenable to traditional population models. At the other extreme, some long-lived plants have such protracted tenancy of their microsites that it is impossible to establish what pattern of dynamics (if any) their populations exhibit. A relatively small number of species show what we would traditionally regard as population dynamics at a given point in space (i.e. reasonably predictable trajectories that can be modelled byNt+1=f(Nt)). A major difficulty in generalizing about plant dynamics is that the majority of species are successional; their recruitment depends upon the death, through senescence or disturbance, of the dominant plants. Where we do have data spanning several generations, it is clear that: (i) the populations are regulated by density dependent processes; (ii) in contrast to some animal populations, numbers appear to vary less from year to year in places where mean density is higher, and less from place to place in years when mean density is high than when density is low; (iii) few, if any, plant populations show persistent cyclic or chaotic dynamics, but (iv) there are several robust generalizations that stem from the immobility and phenotypic plasticity of plants (the law of constant yield; self-thinning rules, etc.). These generalizations are analysed in the context of simple theoretical models of plant dynamics, and the patterns observed in long-term studies are compared with similar data from animal populations. Two important shortcomings of traditional plant demography are emphasized; (i) the dearth of simple manipulative experiments on such issues as seed limitation, and (ii) the tendency to locate study plots around existing mature individuals (the omission of ‘empty quadrats’ may introduce serious bias into the estimation of plant recruitment rates).Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatiotemporal Demographic Processes in Plant Populations: An Approach and a Case StudyThe American Naturalist, 1990
- The Persistence of Rare Prairie Grasses in Missouri: Environmental Variation Buffered by Reproductive Output of Sparse SpeciesThe American Naturalist, 1989
- Insect Herbivores and Plant Population DynamicsAnnual Review of Entomology, 1989
- Growth, Reproduction and Population DynamicsFunctional Ecology, 1989
- Cross-Correlation in Population Dynamics and the Slope of Spatial Variance: Mean RegressionsOikos, 1987
- Density‐Dependent Population Regulation in a Texas GrasslandEcology, 1986
- An introduction to plant demography with special reference to New Zealand treesNew Zealand Journal of Botany, 1985
- Pathogen mortality of tropical tree seedlings: experimental studies of the effects of dispersal distance, seedling density, and light conditionsOecologia, 1984
- Fire and Other Disturbances of the Forests in Mount Rainier National ParkQuaternary Research, 1982
- The Dynamics of a Colonizing Population of Poa AnnuaEcology, 1981