Small polypoid lesions associated with spastic diverticulosis
- 1 February 1965
- journal article
- abstracts
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 8 (1) , 78-84
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02617055
Abstract
Conclusions Spastic diverticulosis is defined and differentiated from diverticulitis. Persistence of the filling defect and constancy of its location are not essential for the diagnosis of a small polypoid lesion in an area of spastic diverticulosis. A single positive finding of an intraluminal defect in spastic diverticulosis is more significant than numerous negative findings. Discovery of an intraluminal defect in an area of spastic diverticulosis demands re-examination after antispasmodic therapy. Differentiation between a polypoid lesion in an area of diverticulosis and the intrinsic features of diverticulitis are discussed. Circumferential visualization of the colon is essential to differentiate a polyp from a diverticulum. Fecal defects in an area of spastic diverticulosis are comparatively uncommon, so that such a defect should be considered a polypoid lesion until its presence is disproved.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Carcinoma or Diverticulitis in Obstructive Sigmoid LesionsAnnals of Surgery, 1961
- The rectosigmoidal areaDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1960
- DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF CARCINOMA OF THE SIGMOID AND DIVERTICULITISJAMA, 1960
- Intramural DiverticulitisAnnals of Surgery, 1960
- Double-Contrast Examination of the Colon with Special Emphasis on Studies of the SiqmoidRadiology, 1953
- Routine Search for Colonic Polyps by High-Voltage RadiographyRadiology, 1953
- Fictitious Polyps as Seen in Double-Contrast Studies of the ColonRadiology, 1949
- Roentgen-Ray Diagnosis of Malignant and Potentially Malignant Lesions of the Colon and RectumRadiology, 1948
- The Roentgenologic Differential Diagnosis between Cancer and Diverticulitis of the ColonRadiology, 1940
- Diverticulosis, Diverticulitis and Carcinoma of the Colon: A Roentgenological DiscussionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1934