Are survival estimates and models obtained by capture-recapture correct? A triple analysis of data with known dates of death
Open Access
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Bird Study
- Vol. 46 (sup1) , S253-S260
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00063659909477252
Abstract
We use data from a survey of women with metastatic breast cancer coming more or less regularly for check-ups as a real-size test of capture-recapture methodology and models. Unlike capture-recapture data of animals, the date of death of each individual is exactly known. The individuals were separated into four groups; the study lasted for 10 years separated into 32 visit occasions (one every fourth month). We analysed the data three times: once with standard survival analysis with known date of death (discrete-time proportional hazards models); once with capture-recapture models after removing the date of death (using 'live recaptur' records); and once with 'return rates' corrected by later encounters of the individuals ('minimum number alive' estimates). Comparing the results obtained from the three methods confirms the efficiency of capture-recapture analysis.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pooled Population Parameter Estimates from Mark-Recapture DataBiometrics, 1994
- Analysing Incomplete Longitudinal Binary Responses: A Likelihood-Based ApproachBiometrics, 1994
- The statistical analysis of survival in animal populationsTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1993
- Assessing the influence of reversible disease indicators on survivalStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- Analysis of Doubly-Censored Survival Data, with Application to AIDSPublished by JSTOR ,1989
- Estimation and Analysis of Survival Distributions for Radio-Tagged AnimalsBiometrics, 1989
- Regression Models and Life-TablesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1972
- Haemoglobin Levels, Growth and Survival in Two Microtus PopulationsEcology, 1962