Fiscal Year Ends and Nonlinear Incentive Contracts: The Effect on Business Seasonality
- 1 February 1998
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Vol. 113 (1) , 149-185
- https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555559
Abstract
Salesperson and executive compensation contracts typically specify a nonlinear relationship between firm revenues and pay. These agents therefore have incentive to manipulate prices, influence the timing of customer purchases, and vary effort over their firms' fiscal years. This paper empirically establishes results consistent with agents' focusing on performance over the fiscal year. Most notably, in addition to varying with the calendar business cycle, manufacturing firms' sales are higher at the end of the fiscal year, and lower at the beginning, than they are in the middle. Further evidence is found in fiscal-year price movements and patterns in the industry variation of fiscal-year effects.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to IncentivesJournal of Political Economy, 1997
- Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?Published by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1997
- Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a TimeThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997
- Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund IndustryThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Risk Aversion, Performance Pay, and the Principal-Agent ProblemJournal of Political Economy, 1994
- DOES EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AFFECT INVESTMENT?Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1992
- Do Incentives Matter? The Case of Navy RecruitersILR Review, 1990
- The Seasonal Cycle and the Business CycleJournal of Political Economy, 1989
- Efficient Estimators for Regressing Regression CoefficientsThe American Statistician, 1974
- The Information Content of Annual Earnings AnnouncementsJournal of Accounting Research, 1968