Human Strength: Terminology, Measurement, and Interpretation of Data
- 1 June 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 12 (3) , 297-313
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872087001200307
Abstract
Application of strength data to human engineering problems is often hampered by ambiguities of both terminology and data. This paper attempts to point out some of the problems. After defining “strength” and clarifying related terms, mechanical, physiological, and statistical implications of strength testing are discussed. It becomes obvious that strength data are fully relevant to human engineering problems only if the operator must exert maximal static muscle force; if submaximal forces are required, the applicability of strength data is very limited. Research is needed to establish relations between human static force capacity and the abilities to perform maximal or submaximal dynamic work. At present there is little evidence that static force data accurately predict dynamic performance.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physiological and subjective reactions to different physical work loadsPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1968
- The Relevance of Laboratory Studies to Practical SituationsErgonomics, 1967
- Work and effort.Journal of Applied Physiology, 1967
- The Human Body in Equipment DesignPublished by Harvard University Press ,1966
- Biomechanics of MuscleJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1966
- ScalingAnnual Review of Psychology, 1965
- The Load-Endurance Relationship for a Static Manual ResponseHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1964
- Motor SkillsAnnual Review of Psychology, 1964
- Body Stabilization and the Strength of Arm ExtensionHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1962
- Subjective scale of force for a large muscle group.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962