The effect of mouthguard design on stresses in the tooth-bone complex
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 34 (6) , 942-947
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200206000-00006
Abstract
N. K. CUMMINS and I. R. SPEARS. The effect of mouthguard design on stresses in the tooth-bone complex. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 942–947, 2002. Mouthguards protect the tooth-bone complex from impact loads that occur during sporting activity. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of varying mouthguard thickness and stiffness on the magnitude of tensile stresses in the tooth-bone-complex. A two-dimensional, plane stress, finite element representation of a central maxillary incisor (CMI) is created. For validation purposes, displacements of the incisal edge of the unprotected tooth model are compared with in vivo displacements under similar loads. A protective mouthguard is then superimposed over the model with varied labial thickness (1–6 mm) and stiffness (9–900MPa) representing a range of designs available. A large horizontal static load of 500N is then applied to the anterior surface of the mouthguard and the resulting stresses in the tooth-bone complex are presented. It is suggested that this loading condition most accurately represent the situation occurring when a guarded tooth collides with a soft object (e.g. boxing glove). It is generally found that mouthguard thickness and stiffness are both desirable in terms of reducing stresses. However, the protection offered by the low-stiffness guards, regardless of thickness, is minimal. Since this low-stiffness (9MPa) is representative of the most common choice of material in mouthguard fabrication, such findings may cast doubt on the ability of popular mouthguards to redistribute stress. While few would disagree that these low-stiffness guards absorb shock during hard-object collisions (e.g. baseballs), they may not protect the tooth-bone during soft-object collisions (e.g. boxing gloves). In order to optimize their protective capabilities for a range of loads, the range of materials used in mouthguard construction may have to be reconsidered.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Shock absorption potential of different mouth guard materialsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1999
- Experimental comparative study of various mouthguardsDental Traumatology, 1999
- A preliminary study of patient comfort associated with customised mouthguards.British Journal of Sports Medicine, 1999
- Application of laminates to mouthguards: finite element analysisJournal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 1998
- An in vitro study of the efficacy of mouthguard protection for dentoalveolar injuries in deciduous and mixed dentitionsDental Traumatology, 1996
- Acute injuries in soccer, ice hockey, volleyball, basketball, judo, and karate: analysis of national registry dataBMJ, 1995
- Structure-Property Relations and Crack Resistance at the Bovine Dentin-Enamel JunctionJournal of Dental Research, 1994
- Dynamic resistance of teeth: technical considerations and applications of an experimental deviceDental Traumatology, 1991
- A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: The first decadeJournal of Biomechanics, 1983
- Stress transmitted through mouth protectorsThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 1968