Evidence‐Free Forensics and Enemies of Objectivity Paul R. Gross
- 24 September 1998
- book chapter
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP)
Abstract
Feminist philosopher Elizabeth A. Lloyd has contributed to the so-called science wars a lengthy book chapter attacking scientist-authors who have recently defended natural science from various indictments (e.g., sexism, racism, masculinism, militarism, imperialism) lodged against it in the field of “science studies”. Her main charge is that the named scientists, not those against whose charges they defend science, are the real enemies of objectivity. It is argued that her methods are old and well-known devices of propaganda; her conclusions are therefore nugatory.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- My Science WarsThe Hudson Review, 1997
- Squaring the Circle: Hobbes on Philosophy and GeometryJournal of the History of Ideas, 1996
- The Loves of the PlantsScientific American, 1996
- Science and Anti-Science: Objectivity and Its Real EnemiesPublished by Springer Nature ,1996
- Feminist Epistemology: Implications for Philosophy of SciencePhilosophy of Science, 1994
- What Could A Feminist Science Be?Monist, 1994
- Menstruation as a Defense Against Pathogens Transported by SpermThe Quarterly Review of Biology, 1993
- Pre-theoretical assumptions in evolutionary explanations of female sexualityPhilosophical Studies, 1993
- Cognitive commitment and the Strong ProgramSocial Epistemology, 1992
- A manifestoSocial Epistemology, 1992