Comparison of the Clinical Effectiveness of Oseltamivir and Zanamivir against Influenza Virus Infection in Children
Open Access
- 1 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 47 (3) , 339-345
- https://doi.org/10.1086/589748
Abstract
Background. We compared the clinical effectiveness of oseltamivir and zanamivir in children with influenza A (H1N1) virus, influenza A (H3N2) virus, and influenza B virus infections. Methods. Total febrile period and the duration of fever after the start of treatment were compared between an oseltamivir-treated group (mean age, 8.9 years; range, 4.0–15.9 years) and a zanamivir-treated group (mean age, 10.0 years; range, 4.0–15.7 years) in the pediatric outpatient clinics of our hospitals. Oseltamivir was used to treat 91 children with influenza A (H3N2) infection and 24 children with influenza A (H1N1) infection. Zanamivir was used to treat 35 children with influenza A (H3N2) infection and 12 children with influenza A (H1N1) infection. Oseltamivir was also used to treat 128 children with influenza B virus infection, and zanamivir was used to treat 59 with influenza B virus infection. Results. There was no statistically significant difference in total febrile period or duration of fever after the start of treatment between the oseltamivir-treated group and the zanamivir-treated group of children with influenza A (H3N2) infection (mean duration of febrile period, 2.40 days vs. 2.39 days; mean duration of fever after the start of treatment, 1.35 days vs. 1.40 days), influenza A (H1N1) (mean duration of febrile period, 2.60 days vs. 2.46 days; mean duration of fever after the start of treatment, 1.79 days vs, 1.54 days), or influenza B (mean duration of febrile period, 2.95 days vs. 2.84 days; mean duration of fever after the start of treatment, 1.86 days vs. 1.67 days). Oseltamivir was more effective against influenza A (H3N2) than against influenza A (H1N1) or influenza B. Conclusions. Oseltamivir and zanamivir were equally effective in reducing the febrile period of children with influenza A (H1N1), influenza A (H3N2), and influenza B virus infection.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Zanamivir Treatment Is Equally Effective for Both Influenza A and Influenza BClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Emergence of Influenza B Viruses With Reduced Sensitivity to Neuraminidase InhibitorsJAMA, 2007
- Lower Clinical Effectiveness of Oseltamivir against Influenza B Contrasted with Influenza A Infection in ChildrenClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Sensitivity of influenza viruses to zanamivir and oseltamivir: A study performed on viruses circulating in France prior to the introduction of neuraminidase inhibitors in clinical practiceAntiviral Research, 2005
- Resistant influenza A viruses in children treated with oseltamivir: descriptive studyPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Susceptibility of human influenza viruses from Australasia and South East Asia to the neuraminidase inhibitors zanamivir and oseltamivirAntiviral Research, 2004
- Pharmacoscintigraphic Evaluation of Lung Deposition of Inhaled Zanamivir in Healthy VolunteersClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1999
- Plaque assay and primary isolation of influenza a viruses in an established line of canine kidney cells (MDCK) in the presence of trypsinMedical Microbiology and Immunology, 1975