Indonesian Monetary Policy During the 1997–98 Crisis: A Monetarist Perspective
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies
- Vol. 36 (3) , 49-64
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910012331338953
Abstract
This paper defends the IMF's strategy of targeting base money (M0) in 1997–98 against the criticism by Grenville (2000) that it was destined to fail because M0 is mainly demand determined and the demand for it was increased by a large and unpredictable amount by the banking panic. Grenville contends that Indonesian monetary policy should have aimed at domestic price stability. It is argued here that the growth of M0 far exceeded what could be justified by last resort lending to accommodate the banking panic, and that rapid inflation could only have been avoided by preventing most of the expansion of the public's cash holding that actually occurred. Achieving a modest target for domestic inflation would not therefore have been very different in practice from setting tight limits on the growth of M0. In contrast, both these policies would have been very different from the loss of control over M0 that actually occurred.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Monetary Policy and the Exchange Rate During the CrisisBulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 2000
- Survey of Recent DevelopmentsBulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 2000
- Lessons for monetary and banking policies from the 1997–98 economic crises in Indonesia and ThailandJournal of Asian Economics, 1999
- Crisis-Driven Changes to the Banking Laws and RegulationsBulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 1999
- Survey of Recent DevelopmentsBulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 1999
- FDICIA After Five YearsJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1997
- Central bank independence, growth, investment, and real ratesCarnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1993