Defining Cancer Patients As Being in the Terminal Phase: Who Receives a Formal Diagnosis, and What Are the Effects?
- 20 October 2005
- journal article
- supportive care-and-quality-of-life
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 23 (30) , 7411-7416
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.16.493
Abstract
Physicians either do not define cancer patients as being terminal, or their prognostic estimates tend to be optimistic. This might affect patients' appropriate and timely referral to specialist palliative care services or can lead to unintended acute hospitalization. We used the Danish Cancer Register and four administrative registers to perform a retrospective cohort study in 3,445 patients who died as a result of cancer. We used the Danish “terminal declaration” issued by a physician as a proxy for a formal terminal diagnosis (prognosis of death within 6 months). The terminal declaration gives right to economic benefits and increased care for the dying. We investigated patient-related factors of receiving an explicit terminal diagnosis by logistic regression and then analyzed the effects of such a diagnosis on admission rate per week and place of death. Thirty-four percent of patients received a formal terminal diagnosis. Age of ≥ 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.56; P < .001), women (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.96; P = .02), hematologic cancer (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.41; P < .001), and a less than 1-month survival time (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.15; P < .001) were associated with a lesser likelihood of receiving a formal terminal diagnosis. Explicit terminal diagnosis was associated with lower admission rate and an adjusted OR of hospital death of 0.25 (95% CI, 0.21 to 0.29). Women and the elderly were less likely to receive a formal terminal diagnosis. The formal terminal diagnosis reduced hospital admissions and increased the possibilities of dying at home.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resurrecting Treatment Histories of Dead PatientsJAMA, 2004
- Diagnostic Accuracy of the Palliative Prognostic Score in Hospitalized Patients With Advanced CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- A delay they can ill afford: delays in obtaining Attendance Allowance for older, terminally ill cancer patients, and the role of health and social care professionals in reducing themHealth & Social Care in the Community, 2004
- Barriers to Hospice Care and Referrals: Survey of Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions in a Health Maintenance OrganizationJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2004
- Cancer of pancreasPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Planning for a good death: responding to unexpected eventsBMJ, 2003
- ‘Hitting you over the head’: Oncologists’ disclosure of prognosis to advanced cancer patientsBioethics, 2003
- Validity and completeness of registration of surgically treated malignant gynaecological diseases in the Danish National Hospital RegistryJournal of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 2001
- Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study Commentary: Why do doctors overestimate? Commentary: Prognoses should be based on proved indices not intuitionBMJ, 2000
- Completeness of Cancer Registration in Denmark 1943–1966 and Efficacy of Record Linkage ProceduresInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1988