A survey of routine head CT protocols in Australia.
- 1 April 1997
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 70 (832) , 372-374
- https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.70.832.9166073
Abstract
The choice of scanning protocol in CT will affect the dose delivered to the patient. A nationwide survey of CT operators was carried out in Australia in 1994 to determine the variation in routine head CT protocols. Only 29% of respondents used the supraorbitomeatal (SOM) baseline and thus avoided scanning the eyes. At 74% of sites, the routine protocol included scans both before and after injection of contrast. However, the post-contrast protocol differed from that used in the pre-contrast series in a number of cases. Where 5 mm thick slices were used, the mAs was 16% higher than for 10 mm thick slices. Increased awareness of the influence of baseline, slice thickness/spacing and accompanying exposure factors on patient dose may lead to greater standardization of head CT scanning protocols.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Increasing Importance of X Ray Computed Tomography as a Source of Medical ExposureRadiation Protection Dosimetry, 1995
- Radiation dose to the lens from computed tomography scanning in a neuroradiology departmentThe British Journal of Radiology, 1995
- Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomographyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1994
- Radiation dose in CT.RadioGraphics, 1992
- Determination of Collective Effective Dose Equivalent due to Computed Tomography in Denmark in 1989Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 1992
- Average radiation dose in standard CT examinations of the head: results of the 1990 NEXT survey.Radiology, 1992
- Radiation Doses to the Lens of the Eye During Computerised Tomography of the Orbit; A Comparison of Four Modern Computerised Tomography UnitsAustralasian Radiology, 1990
- Average radiation doses in a standard head examination for 250 CT systems.Radiology, 1987
- A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomographyMedical Physics, 1981
- Statistical limitations in x‐ray reconstructive tomographyMedical Physics, 1976