Assessing Human Health Response in Life Cycle Assessment Using ED10s and DALYs: Part 1—Cancer Effects
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 22 (5) , 931-946
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00262
Abstract
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a framework for comparing products according to their total estimated environmental impact, summed over all chemical emissions and activities associated with a product at all stages in its life cycle (from raw material acquisition, manufacturing, use, to final disposal). For each chemical involved, the exposure associated with the mass released into the environment, integrated over time and space, is multiplied by a toxicological measure to estimate the likelihood of effects and their potential consequences. In this article, we explore the use of quantitative methods drawn from conventional single‐chemical regulatory risk assessments to create a procedure for the estimation of the cancer effect measure in the impact phase of LCA. The approach is based on the maximum likelihood estimate of the effect dose inducing a 10% response over background, ED10, and default linear low‐dose extrapolation using the slope βED10 (0.1/ED10). The calculated effects may correspond to residual risks below current regulatory compliance requirements that occur over multiple generations and at multiple locations; but at the very least they represent a “using up” of some portion of the human population's ability to accommodate emissions. Preliminary comparisons are performed with existing measures, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S. EPA's) slope factor measure q1*. By analyzing bioassay data for 44 chemicals drawn from the EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) database, we explore estimating ED10 from more readily available information such as the median tumor dose rate TD50 and the median single lethal dose LD50. Based on the TD50, we then estimate the ED10 for more than 600 chemicals. Differences in potential consequences, or severity, are addressed by combining βED10 with the measure disability adjusted life years per affected person, DALYp. Most of the variation among chemicals for cancer effects is found to be due to differences in the slope factors (βED10) ranging from 10−4 up to 104 (risk of cancer/mg/kg‐day).Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chemical toxicity indicators for human health: Case study for classification of chronic noncancer chemical hazards in life‐cycle assessmentEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2002
- Thresholds in Toxicology and Risk AssessmentInternational Journal of Toxicology, 1999
- Noncancer Risk Assessment: A Probabilistic Alternative to Current PracticeHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 1996
- An Overview of the Report: Correlation Between Carcinogenic Potency and the Maximum Tolerated Dose: Implications for Risk AssessmentRisk Analysis, 1993
- Quantitative Risk Assessment for Teratological EffectsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1989
- On the Relationship Between Carcinogenicity and Acute ToxicityRisk Analysis, 1989
- Tautology or not tautology?Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 1987
- Multistage models of carcinogenesis.Environmental Health Perspectives, 1985
- A new method for determining allowable daily intakes*1Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 1984
- Use of Acute Toxicity to Estimate Carcinogenic RiskRisk Analysis, 1984