Needle stick injuries: a comparison of practice and attitudes in two UK District General Hospitals*
Open Access
- 27 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anaesthesia
- Vol. 61 (9) , 867-872
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04751.x
Abstract
Hospital staff are at risk from occupational exposure to blood‐borne viruses due to needle stick injuries. Occupational health departments have invested considerable resources in the prevention of these injuries, which can be very distressing to the affected individuals. We surveyed health care workers, i.e. doctors, nurses and operating department practitioners, in the operating theatre and critical care units of two UK hospitals located in the Midlands and Merseyside to compare attitudes and experiences. There were significant deficiencies in several aspects of the safe practice of universal precautions. These deficiencies were similar in the two hospitals surveyed and may reflect a national trend. We conclude that every individual, department and trust needs to reflect on their practice and address these deficiencies.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Occupational HazardsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategiesJournal of Hospital Infection, 2003
- Guidelines for Using Antiretroviral Agents among HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents: The Panel on Clinical Practices for Treatment of HIV*Annals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- A Case–Control Study of HIV Seroconversion in Health Care Workers after Percutaneous ExposureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals Part I. Evolution of isolation practicesAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1996