Comparison of diffractive and refractive effects in two-wavelength adaptive transmission
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- Published by Optica Publishing Group in Journal of the Optical Society of America A
- Vol. 1 (7) , 785-787
- https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.1.000785
Abstract
Holmes and Rao Gudimetla [J. Opt. Soc. Am. 73, 1119–1122 (1983)] analyze the performance of an adaptive optical system in which the optical path differences caused by atmospheric turbulence are measured at one wavelength and used to compensate an outgoing laser beam of a different wavelength. The wavelength dependence of diffraction is shown to lead to imperfect correction. Earlier work [E. P. Wallner, Proc. Soc. Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng. 75, 119–125 (1976); J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 407–409 (1977)] shows that the wavelength dependence of the index of refraction of air also leads to imperfect correction for beams not directed vertically. In this Communication I compare the refractive and diffractive effects and show that either may be more important, depending on the geometry of the case and the wavelengths used.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strehl’s ratio for a two-wavelength continuously deformable optical adaptive transmitterJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1983
- Minimizing atmospheric dispersion effects in compensated imagingJournal of the Optical Society of America, 1977
- A survey of clear-air propagation effects relevant to optical communicationsProceedings of the IEEE, 1970
- Optical Refractive Index of Air: Dependence on Pressure, Temperature and CompositionApplied Optics, 1967