Gender Differences in Apparent Motion Perception
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 20 (3) , 307-314
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p200307
Abstract
Distance disparity is a strong cue to element correspondence in apparent motion. Using a 2-AFC paradigm we have previously shown that shape similarity also plays a role. We now demonstrate a small gender difference in these effects: women are more sensitive to distance disparity, whereas men are more sensitive to differences in shape. Furthermore, in the competing presence of a shape cue, women's sensitivity to distance decreases while men's sensitivity is unaffected. These observations may be related to putative gender differences in the ‘form’ and ‘motion—spatial relations’ cortical pathways.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortexTrends in Neurosciences, 1988
- Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depthJournal of Neuroscience, 1987
- Reaction time assessments of gender differences in visual-spatial performancePerception & Psychophysics, 1987
- Displacement limits for spatial frequency filtered random-dot cinematograms in apparent motionVision Research, 1983
- Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motionPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1980
- Sex differences in human brain asymmetry: a critical surveyBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1980
- Sex Differences in Cognitive Functioning: Evidence, Determinants, ImplicationsHuman Development, 1980
- The locus of sex differences in spatial abilityPerception & Psychophysics, 1979
- Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- A short-range process in apparent motionVision Research, 1974