THE COMPARATIVE FALLACY IN INTERLANGUAGE STUDIES: THE CASE OF SYSTEMATICITY1
- 1 March 1983
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Language Learning
- Vol. 33 (1) , 1-17
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00983.x
Abstract
Studies of second language acquisition often employ analytical concepts defined relative to the target language (such as obligatory context, error, etc.). It is demonstrated here that this practice can be a serious obstacle to the investigation of crucial questions about the nature of learners' languages. The difficulties caused by this practice—called here the “comparative fallacy”—are illustrated in an investigation of the framework proposed by Tarone, Frauenfelder, and Selinker (1976) to study the issue of interlanguage systematicity and variability. Their framework is shown to result in incorrect or unrevealing analyses of systematicity and to obscure the character of the interlanguage. These defects are shown to be the results of the comparative fallacy.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Order-of-Acquisition vs. Dynamic Paradigm: A Comparison of Method in Interlanguage ResearchTESOL Quarterly, 1979
- ON THE NATURE OF INTERLANGUAGE SYSTEMSLanguage Learning, 1976
- LEARNER INTUITIONS OF GRAMMATICALLYLanguage Learning, 1976
- The Language of Second‐Language Learners: The Broader IssuesThe Modern Language Journal, 1975
- The Learner's Interlanguage as a System of Variable RulesTESOL Quarterly, 1975
- THE INTERLANGUAGE HYPOTHESIS EXTENDED TO CHILDREN1Language Learning, 1975
- NATURAL SEQUENCES IN CHILD SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION1Language Learning, 1974
- A First LanguagePublished by Harvard University Press ,1973
- The Acquisition of Noun and Verb InflectionsChild Development, 1968
- THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LEARNER'S ERRORSInternational Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1967