Three Reasons Not to Believe in an Autism Epidemic
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Vol. 14 (2) , 55-58
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00334.x
Abstract
According to some lay groups, the nation is experiencing an autism epidemic—a rapid escalation in the prevalence of autism for unknown reasons. However, no sound scientific evidence indicates that the increasing number of diagnosed cases of autism arises from anything other than purposely broadened diagnostic criteria, coupled with deliberately greater public awareness and intentionally improved case finding. Why is the public perception so disconnected from the scientific evidence? In this article we review three primary sources of misunderstanding: lack of awareness about the changing diagnostic criteria, uncritical acceptance of a conclusion illogically drawn in a California-based study, and inattention to a crucial feature of the “child count” data reported annually by the U.S. Department of Education.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Autism and CreativityPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2004
- Epidemiological Surveys of Autism and Other Pervasive Developmental Disorders: An UpdateJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2003
- The epidemiology of autistic spectrum disorders: is the prevalence rising?Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2002
- Prevalence of Autism in a United States Population: The Brick Township, New Jersey, InvestigationPediatrics, 2001
- Pervasive Developmental Disorders in Preschool ChildrenJAMA, 2001
- Practice parameter: Screening and diagnosis of autismNeurology, 2000
- A Screening Instrument for Autism at 18 Months of Age: A 6-Year Follow-up StudyJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2000
- Diagnosis and DefinitionPublished by Springer Nature ,1978