Comparison of Cephazolin and Gentamicin in the Prophylactic Treatment of Infection in Out-patient Urinary Tract Endoscopy
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 53 (2) , 138-140
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1981.tb03152.x
Abstract
SUMMARY— Previous studies have shown that the incidence of rigors following urinary tract endoscopy in out‐patients may be as high as 1 6% and that this incidence can be significantly lowered to about 7% by the administration of intramuscular cephazolin sodium at the time of endoscopy. In order to reduce further the rigor rate, a comparison of intramuscular cephazolin with gentamicin has been carried out with 200 patients in each group. There was a rigor rate of 10% and 9% respectively with no significant difference between the 2 drugs. There was no correlation between an infected urine and the occurrence of a rigor. Cephazolin sodium remains the drug of choice in this situation because of its low toxicity.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of the morbidity and value of prophylactic cephazolin sodium in urinary tract instrumentation in out-patientsCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 1980
- Comparison of laboratory methods in the diagnosis of urinary tract infection.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1976
- Antibacterial activity and pharmacokinetic behaviour of cefazolin as compared with five other cephalosporin antibioticsInfection, 1974
- Clinical Studies of Cefazolin and Comparison with Other CephalosporinsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1973
- Cefazolin, a New Semisynthetic Cephalosporin Antibiotic. V. Distribution of Cefazolin-14C in Mice and Rats after Parenteral AdministrationCHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN, 1972
- Ototoxicity of GentamicinThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1969
- Bacteriæmia following operations on the urethraThe Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology, 1930